|
1
|
- July 15, 2008
- Robert Beard
|
|
2
|
- Background
- What information is needed?
- Assessment– How well are we doing today?
- Notional Steps for Integration of Convective Wx
- Open Issues/Needed Research
- Summary
|
|
3
|
- Dramatic rise in fuel prices, airline profitability concerns heighten
demands for
- Increased accuracy of wx prediction and consequent flight scheduling
efficiency
- Minimizing in-flight delays
- Efficient routing around storm cells
- Elimination of unnecessary re-routing
- Efficient, incremental recovery after storm has cleared
- Increased congestion makes responses to predicted wx impacts even more
critical
|
|
4
|
- Accurate wx forecasts (increased precision, less uncertainty)
- Prediction of winds, icing, temps, pressure
- Prediction of convective cells:
- Predicted position and velocity
- Intensity, echo tops
- Shape
- Growth/decay predictions
- uncertainty
- Enhancements to ATM Decision Support Tools to accommodate advanced wx
forecasts and uncertainties
|
|
5
|
- Convective Wx forecasting:
- Near-term [0-1 hr] (E.g.: TCWF, ITWS, CIWS)
- Long-term [2-6 hr] (E.g.: Collaborative Convective Forecast Product–
large uncertainties
- Self-assessment of accuracy can prove a valuable accuracy metric
- Experimental collaborative convective product (Terminal) [2-5 hr]
- Need: 0-2 hrs for avg duration flights;
- 2-6 hrs for planning &
for longer flights
- Well-defined “forced” cells more accurately predicted than “pop-up”
convection
|
|
6
|
- Most DSTs operational in today’s NAS:
- Make no attempt to model dynamic convective wx cells
- Rely on the controller/TMC to fuse data and tactically (manually) make
traffic adjustments
- Lack automation to generate suggested traffic management responses to
predicted convective cells
- Issues limiting progress
- Accuracy and precision of convective cell predictions, especially for
- Software modifications/restructuring required for legacy DST
- Some exceptions are:
- RAPT
- Prototypes of TMA
- Other R&D prototypes
|
|
7
|
- 1. Display wx cell as an overlay on ATM Situation Display
- Real time and/or predicted
- Controller/TMC doesn’t have to mentally superimpose, extrapolate
- 2. Compute blocked airspace as function of time
- Initially as rigid simplistic volume of airspace (“moving SUA/FCA”)
- Subsequently refine for dynamic shape and intensity
- 3. Auto-generate response options to blocked airspace
- Determine alternative routing and/or configuration
- Reduce sector/route capacity; manage impact to near-by sectors
- Reallocate unused capacity from blockage to unaffected streams
- 4. Automate recovery planning for wx-impacted flights
- Restoration profile for capacities (e.g., per aircraft capabilities)
- Strategies for “draining” backlogged flows
|
|
8
|
- Establish/improve quantitative measures of performance:
- Prediction accuracy for cell position, velocity, intensity, shape,
growth/decay, uncertainties
- Separation: Fully safe yet
efficient separation between a/c and predicted convective wx as it
forms, approaches, departs, dissipates
- Unused capacity: Automation
systems to translate Wx predictions, system status, and user demand
into efficient system operations
- Safety, efficiency operational metrics: normal èdegraded è recovery
- Develop/enhance algorithms to re-route and flow traffic around wx
problems per these performance measures
- Establish/refine data repositories permitting “replay” of actual scenario results against
enhanced algorithms
- Incorporate enhanced algorithms into tactical/strategic automation for
traffic control and flow management
- Analyze/document new vs old operational procedures
|
|
9
|
- Much progress made in prediction accuracy for convective wx [0-1 hr]
- Need improved accuracies for longer term prediction to permit more
adequate ATM planning and response
- Need enhancements to DSTs to accommodate advancements in convective wx
predictions
- Where convective uncertainties are large, incorporate probability of
occurrence into flow management planning/projections
|